Your daily dose of global news, tech trends, financial insights, health updates, and cultural commentary.
Popular

HHS Denies Funding to Wuhan Lab for 10 Years

The Wuhan Institute of Virology in China has been banned from receiving funding from the Health and Human Services Department (HHS) for a period of 10 years. This decision comes in light of concerns surrounding the institute’s involvement in risky research using U.S. taxpayer money and its connection to the origins of the coronavirus.

HHS had given the lab an opportunity to provide an explanation, but it failed to respond to the inquiries. As a result, HHS finalized the ban, which is three times longer than the usual punishment for such cases.

Many Republicans have welcomed this decision, emphasizing the importance of cutting off American taxpayer dollars from a lab that has conducted dangerous research with inadequate biosafety measures. Representative Brad Wenstrup, chairman of the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, stated that the U.S. officials were aware of the risky research prior to the COVID-19 outbreak but did not take appropriate action.

The exact origins of the coronavirus are still debated, with one theory suggesting natural exposure to an animal and another theory centering on the Wuhan lab. The lab was conducting coronavirus research using funds from the U.S., and it was required to adhere to certain restrictions on virus activity. However, U.S. officials concluded that the research may have exceeded the permitted level, contributing to the severity of the situation.

The standard penalty for violating grant terms is a three-year prohibition, but in this case, HHS deemed a 10-year ban necessary. The Wuhan Institute of Virology’s refusal to acknowledge or provide information regarding the violation was considered an aggravating factor.

This decision reflects the U.S. government’s commitment to ensuring accountability in scientific research and funding. By imposing this ban, HHS aims to prevent any further support to a facility that has been implicated in controversial research practices. It also serves as a reminder of the importance of proper oversight and adherence to safety protocols in scientific endeavors.

Share this article
Shareable URL
Prev Post

Ford Agrees to New Labor Agreement in Canada as Negotiations in U.S. Progress Slowly

Next Post

DeSantis Vows to Bring $2 Gas and Reverse Biden’s Climate Agenda if Elected President

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read next
Within the 2021 Summer time Olympics, all eyes had been on Simone Biles as she led the U.S. gymnastics group on…
BOSTON — A former professor at Harvard Medical Faculty and founding father of one of many nation’s largest…